Season's Greetings to all our readers and supporters.
The world is but one nation and its citizens one people.
I am very pleased with the outcome of Paris COP21 Climate Conference. Almost all nations around the planet are represented one way or another. Many nations' top leadership attended the Conference. It
is so important to have such dialogue in order to save our planet that we share and live in. Pollution of the planet of one kind or another including wars, affect everyone of us no matter where you
It is through genuine dialogue like this in future that we are going to save the planet, our world and our people.
Australia and many other nations have very successful multicultural, multiracial, multi-religious national policies that allow peoples of different cultures, ethnic and racial origins,
religions etc to live in genuine harmony. All these need to be implemented properly and secured and protected by civilised laws.
It will never be achieved if human beings try to solve the differences through the use of force and see who can kill the other first to gain the upper hand.
United Nations and leadership of the world should really look at the root causes of all the conflicts around the world at present and try to solve them through face to face dialogue and the rule of
Who do not wish to live their lives among families, friends and fellow citizens in happiness, peace and harmony?
It is not the problem of money. It is the mindset that counts. It is the civilised education, behaviour and adhere to rule of laws that count. It is also mutual respect of differences and
sit down and discuss them that will eventually give everyone a solution for living in happiness, peace and harmony.
I hope these are food for thought for Christmas and New Year 2016
May I take this opportunity to thank all our volunteers for their contributions and support throughout the year.
May I wish you all a very Merry Christmas and a safe, peaceful and harmonious New Year 2016.
Dr Ka Sing Chua
CC: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; Canberra@mofa.gov.ae; Embassy.email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; HTCM@yandex.ru; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; Canberra@diplobel.fed.be;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca; Kontakt@info.diplo.de;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; ; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; Editor@Think-Israel.org; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; 'email@example.com'; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Alexandra.firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; NewsLetter@afp.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Editor@project-syndicate.org;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; pno6RCJECqcC_U@xiaonei-inc.com;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; ; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; editor@Malaysia-Chronicle.com; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; Martintsai@onebox.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Frank.firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
Congressman.Reyes@mail.house.gov; firstname.lastname@example.org; InternetPost@bundesregierung.de; Coca.email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; ; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; 'email@example.com'; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: Why China rejects Philippine, Japanese, US claims on South China Sea issue
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:37:45 +0800
Dear President Obama,
Would you like to comment, please?
New Cross-strait Alliance.
Facts & news not widely reported by Western & other English language media : Why China rejects Philippine, Japanese, US claims on South China Sea issue
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:05:43 +1100
Foreign Minister's address at the ASEAN Regional Forum which is available to all the media but somehow not reported in western media ... Certainly not, as I‘m aware, in any of the Australian
rejects Philippine, Japanese, US claims on South China Sea issue
Foreign Minister Wang Yi made clear China's stance on the South China Sea issue on Thursday, rejecting the claims of the Philippines, Japan and United States.
the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), Wang said China felt imperative to speak the truth and make clear its stance as the South China Sea issue was raised by some countries at the ARF and the East Asia
Summit Foreign Ministers' Meeting earlier.
all, the general situation in the South China Sea is stable, and the possibility of a major conflict simply doesn't exist," he said. "Therefore, China is against any unconstructive words and deeds
that exaggerate differences and stand-off, and create tensions. They do not comply with facts at all."
China has the
same concern as other countries over freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, as most of China's merchandise is transported by the Sea, the Chinese minister said, noting that freedom of
navigation there is very important to China, too.
"China has always held the stance that parties enjoy freedom of navigation and flyover in the South China Sea according to international laws. China is willing to work with other parties in keeping
freedom of navigation and flyover in the South China Sea."
to the disputes over the Nansha Islands, Wang pointed out, "It is an old problem."
the South China Sea are China's territories as China is the first country to discover and name the islands, he emphasized.
minister said this year marks the 70th anniversary of the victory of World War II, and 70 years ago China took back Nansha and Xisha Islands, which had been illegally occupied by Japan.
that the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, on which the post-war international order is founded, demanded Japan return the territories it had stolen from China, Wang said.
ships that were used by China to take back the islands were provided by the United States, our ally," he said, adding, "These facts must have been recorded in your respective archives.""Till the
1970s, some countries began to invade and occupy islands and reefs following reports on oil reserves in the South China Sea, infringing the legal rights and interests of China. According to
international laws, China is entitled to defend its own sovereignty, and rights and interests, and to make sure that the illegal actions infringing China's legal rights and interests wouldn't happen
Wang said the
Philippines had failed to tell the truth when raising the South China Sea issue.
He said the
Philippines alleges that Huangyan Island and other related islands and reefs in the South China Sea belong to the Philippines; however, the Treaty of Paris (1898), the Treaty of Washington (1900) and
the Convention between the United States and Great Britain (1930) state clearly that the west limit of the Philippine territory is 118 degrees east longitude, while Huangyan Island and Nansha Islands
are obviously not Philippine territories as they are located completely west to the 118 degrees east longitude.
independence, the Philippines' domestic laws and relevant treaties have all reaffirmed the legal effects of the above- mentioned three treaties and once again expressively defined that the west limit
of the Philippine territory is 118 degrees east longitude, Wang said.
1970, the Philippines illegally occupied eight islands and reefs in China's Nansha Islands through four military operations. That's how the territorial disputes arose between China and the
Philippines," Wang said.
In the Ren'ai
Reef, which is a constituent part of China's Nansha Islands, the Philippines illegally ran an old warship aground in May 1999 at that feature on the pretext of "technical difficulties." China has
made repeated representations to the Philippines, demanding that the latter immediately tow away the vessel. The Philippines, for its part, had on numerous occasions made explicit undertaking to
China to tow away the vessel grounded due to "lack of parts."
the Philippines told China that it would not become the first country that breaches the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC).
said, more than 15 years have passed and the ship has become rusted, the Philippines, instead of fulfilling its promise, has openly declared that it had sneaked concrete and other building materials
into the ship for consolidation.
On March 14,
2014, the Philippine foreign ministry claimed in a statement that the purpose of grounding the warship was to occupy the Ren'ai Reef. The Philippines thus exposed the 15-year lie it has invented and
broke its promise. It's simply short of international credibility, Wang said.
retorted the claims of the Japanese representatives that all artificial islands and reefs in the South China Sea do not produce legal rights for the owner.
see what Japan has done. In recent years, Japan has spent some 10 billion yen (about 80 million US dollars) on the tiny atoll of Okinotori, building it into a de facto island with cement and steel,
and then claimed a right to a continental shelf extending beyond its 200-nautical mile coast boundaries as exclusive economic zone at the United Nations.
most UN members considered Japan's claim inconceivable and chose to decline the proposal.
Japan should review its own words and deeds before criticizing others. Unlike Japan, China has claimed its right to the South China Sea a long time ago, which does not require enhancement through
that China is a de facto victim of the South China Sea issue.
peace and stability in the South China Sea, we have exercised great restraint."
stand is resolving relevant disputes through negotiation and consultation on the basis of respect for historical facts and international laws, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
will never change," he said.
friendly negotiations, Wang said, China and ASEAN countries have formulated a set of mechanisms to properly handle the South China Sea issue.
"dual-track" approach, which indicates that relevant disputes should be addressed by countries directly concerned through friendly consultation and negotiation. This is also the stipulation of
Article 4 of the DOC, to which both China and ASEAN members have made commitments. Both China and ASEAN countries have agreed to make joint efforts to maintain peace and stability in the South China
"I want to
tell you that China and ASEAN are fully capable of maintaining peace in these waters," Wang said.
The second is
about implementation of the DOC and consultation on formulating the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea (COC).
Wang said so
far, the DOC has been carried out smoothly, while some progress has been made in the consultation on formulating the COC.
launch of the consultation less than two years ago, we have passed two consensus documents and the consultation has entered the new phase of discussing 'crucial and complex issues'. We also have
agreed to launch two hotline platforms between China and ASEAN countries, which will soon be put into operation."
China has offered to discuss and formulate preventive measures for maritime risk control to provide a new platform for the discussion of proposals and ideas raised by relevant parties. "It can be put
into practice once a consensus if reached," Wang said.
so-called "three halts" proposal put forward by the United States recently, Wang said it is short of feasibility.
what is the content of the halts? Proposals of different parties are inconsistent. What are the criteria of the halts? Who will set the standards? These problems actually cannot be solved."
welcomes constructive comments on the maintenance of peace and stability in the South China Sea; however, relevant proposals should be feasible and double standards are not allowed in particular," he
"As to the
land reclamation in the South China Sea which some countries are concerned about, it is neither something that happened recently nor initiated by China. In other words, 'the status quo' of the South
China Sea has been changing over the years," Wang said.
construction projects on some manned islets of the Nansha islands, he said, emphasizing that they are aimed at improving working and living conditions on those islets with strict environmental
minister informed his fellow counterparts that by the end of June, China has completed the land reclamation. The next step is to build facilities primarily used for public purposes, including
lighthouse, maritime emergency rescue, weather station, marine scientific research as well as medical and first- aid buildings.
construction is completed, China is willing to open these facilities to countries in the region. As the largest coastal country in the South China Sea, China has the ability and obligation to provide
these maritime public goods to countries in the region," Wang said.
out that an arbitration request over the South China Sea issue was mentioned by the Philippines at the East Asia and ARF foreign ministers' meetings in an attempt to smear China.
"I would like
to respond with facts. First, to settle disputes through direct negotiations between relevant parties is the way advocated by the Charter of the United Nations and a common international practice,"
Wang said. "More importantly, it is also clearly stated in the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC). To this end, China has proposed bilateral talks with the Philippines
and this proposal is still valid. But until today, the Philippine side still refuses our proposal."
As to the
proceeding of starting international arbitration, Wang said the normal practice is that a consensus should be reached first by the countries concerned.
neither did the Philippines inform China in advance, nor it sought China's consent. The Philippines just unilaterally and forcefully initiated the arbitration," he said. "The Chinese side cannot
understand this act, and could only think that there were ulterior motives behind this."
minister contended that Manila should know that China has already issued a statement in 2006 that it does not accept the arbitration under the provisions of section 298 of the United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Sea, which is China's legitimate right under the law.
that it is impossible for China to accept any result of arbitration, the Philippines still insisted on pushing forward the so-called arbitration in violation of the DOC and the agreement with China
to settle the issue bilaterally.
only one possible explanation to this, that is it intends to confront China," he said. "The Philippine people should know the truth, and the country's future should not be hijacked by a minority of
Chinese minister stressed that the door is still open for dialogue. "I believe as long as the two sides sit down and talk seriously, there will always be a solution to the problem, " he said.
From the Editor
The dispute of Senkaku or Diaoyui islands' ownership between China and Japan is concerning many people in Asia and around the world. On one hand Japan claims that she has the sovereignty over them
because they have been under her legal administration since the end of World war 2. While China claims that they belongs to China from the historical perspective. Japan under the Peace Treaty at
the end of World War 2, supposed to return the ownership of these islands back to China. But for some unforeseen circumstances, with the eruption of China civil war, China failed to claim them back
formally from Japan.
Who actually owns this island is the burning issue.
We hope that it will be resolved one way or the other through peaceful negotiation. Failing that, we suggest that the case be decided in the International Court and tribunal. It is better that way
than trying to fight it out militarily. It is not worth having the war to determine the ownership of these islands. As the destruction will be far worse than the benefit for either side. Moreover if
a war is declared , its implication will be unmeasurable in term of its influence with the development of China and Japan. Its disastrous effect will not only affect China and Japan but will extend
to all Asia countries and the world like Europe and US etc. No one is an island anymore. The war will bring enormous economic disaster, humanity hardship and suffering for many many people,
not confined to the Chinese and Japanese.
Cover design for this issue was done by our webmaster James Yin. Thank you James.
Let us hope that the leadership of China and Japan are wiser than that.
we are looking for a bilangual Editor and Assistant Editor to assist us in compiling our regular Emagazine etc. It is voluntary contribution without monetary remuneration. If you are interested,
please contact Dr Ka Sing Chua at email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org
I would like to take this opportunity to again thank my special assistant Dr Yit Seng Yow for patiently help to compile our Emagazine and many other voluntary contributors. Without them, we would not
have our regular Emagazine for you to enjoy.
The Abe administration’s arrogance of power moment
BY KOICHI NAKANO AND NANCY SNOW - SPECIAL TO THE JAPAN TIMES - JUL 16, 2015
On the cusp of the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II when Emperor Hirohito made his historic speech of surrender, the Abe government is attempting to drive through the Diet 11 security
bills that will forever alter the landscape of Japan’s postwar history. The nation that does not wage war will be no more if it gets its way.
Guided in its efforts is a military-industrial complex that is salivating to get Japan to share the burden of fighting with its closest ally, the United States. Japan has recently expressed interest
in joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization missile-building consortium, a move in seamless alliance with this New Normal for Japan, a normal that we believe threatens global security.
As scholars from Japan and the U.S., we oppose the new security bills and call on anyone who is unfamiliar with what’s happening to get informed. What we have here is legislation without
representation; at its worst, tyranny.
In clear violation of Article 9 of the Constitution, which famously renounces war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes,
these bills would provide for Japan’s Self-Defense Forces to cooperate actively with U.S. and other foreign military operations overseas. If adopted, Japan will be able to use military force even
when it is not attacked, under the name of collective self-defense. Let us not mince words: this spells the end of Article 9 without ever formally amending it according to due process of law.
We cannot believe any assurances from a prime minister who thinks nothing of the constitutional ban and popular opposition that these security bills will strictly limit Japan’s military role. This
legislation opens the door to virtually unfettered government discretion over the use of force that violates Japan’s fundamental principle over six decades of an exclusively self-defense posture.
The Japanese people, having been the only population to suffer atomic bombs, are overwhelmingly in support of maintaining peaceful relations with the world. They wish to protect the sanctity and
heritage of Article 9. A nation that renounces war is part of Japan’s peace national brand, and has allowed Japan to develop as a world class economic and culture power with a strong mandate for
humanitarian assistance, disaster relief and development aid.
Should these security bills get passed, Japan will no longer be able to advocate for a peace and nonviolence paradigm in national security. Our view is that Japan’s peace Constitution should not be
altered but should continue to serve as a model for other countries. It should certainly not be “reinterpreted” arbitrarily by the government of the day.
Article 23 of the Constitution guarantees academic freedom, and it is within this guarantee that we, as public scholars in Japan and signatories to the Association of Scholars Opposed to the
Security-related Bills, are speaking out. One of us is an Abe fellow at Keio University and former Fulbright scholar at Sophia University; the other is a political scientist at Sophia University who
received the Friend of the Free Press award this spring from the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of Japan.
We stand with the growing political protests from scholars, students, lawyers, workers and mothers that are coalescing against a government displaying total disregard for democratic speech and
assembly. Japan is the closest Asian ally to the U.S. and we take this binational alliance of democracies literally and to heart. We oppose this government fait accompli that refuses to listen to
citizen debate, discussion, or dialogue. We call on the Abe government to observe the democratic and constitutional due process before it does irreparable damage to the national character of postwar
The Abe government has shown no concern for the Japanese people. It is attempting to circumvent the Constitution by ramming the security bills through the Diet without the constitutionally mandated
process for a constitutional revision (Article 96) requiring a two-third majority of both houses of parliament and a majority support from the people in a special referendum.
We write, backed as we are from thousands of scholars and millions of Japanese who share our opposition, to object to the security bills in principle and process. Our objections are marinated with
affection, concern and care for Japan and the Japanese people.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s administration cannot claim to have a popular mandate for imposing these changes, even if we leave aside the unconstitutionality of the bills. It has a large majority in
both houses only because of record-high voting abstention rates, a divided opposition, a muzzled media, the bias of the first-past-the-post system, and the enormous disparity of the value of the vote
that has been repeatedly ruled to be in a state of unconstitutionality by the courts.
In reality, only one in four voters actively voted for Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party. The prime minister has, nevertheless, said that within 20 to 30 years he will be vindicated; thus, public
opinion, which he seems to view with disdain, is dismissed. We believe that the Japanese people deserve more credit and respect than what they are being shown by their government.
These security bills stand against Japan’s well-deserved human security reputation in the world. Human security puts people’s needs and rights first, and views security within the prism of a
multidisciplinary understanding of the world that involves development studies, education, science and technology for good, and peaceful international relations.
The United Nation’s Human Development Report of 1994 argues that global human security is about promoting “freedom from want” and “freedom from fear” for all people. With Japan’s growing poverty
indices, aging population and record-breaking national debt, these security bills, if passed, will likely lead to greater insecurity just at the time when Japan itself is seeking to become a bigger
player again on the world stage. Before Abe flexes his military muscles, indulges himself in historical revisionism and preaches to China about the rule of law, he should observe the principle of
rule of law at home.
By turning a blind eye on Abe’s arrogance of power moment, the U.S. risks not only aggravating the regional tension and rivalry in Asia-Pacific, but also antagonizing the Japanese public, who came to
embrace the postwar values of constitutionalism, democracy and peace.
Koichi Nakano is a professor of political science at Sophia University. Nancy Snow is an Abe fellow and a visiting professor at Keio University.
China warns Japan against ‘crippling regional peace’ after passage of security bills
AFP-JIJI, JIJI - JUL 17, 2015
BEIJING/SEOUL – China on Thursday urged Tokyo to avoid “crippling regional peace and security” after the Lower House passed bills that could see Japanese troops fight abroad for the first time since
World War II.
“It is fully justified to ask if Japan is going to give up its exclusively defence-oriented policy,” China’s foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said in a statement.
“We solemnly urge the Japanese side to … refrain from jeopardising China’s sovereignty and security interests or crippling regional peace and stability,” Hua said in the statement posted on the
Hua described the passing of the bills as “an unprecedented move since the Second World War.
Japanese forces launched a full-scale invasion of China in 1937 and the wartime history between the Asian powers still heavily colors their relations today.
Beijing — which is also embroiled in a territorial row with Tokyo over disputed islands in the East China Sea — regularly accuses the government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of showing insufficient
contrition for the conflict.
Hua referred to the 70th anniversary of Japan’s defeat in its conflict with China, which Beijing calls “the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.”
“We solemnly urge the Japanese side to draw hard lessons from history,” she added.
The vote on Japan’s military marks a victory for Abe and other nationalists, who have ignored popular anger in a bid to break what they see as the shackles of the U.S.-imposed Constitution.
China’s official Xinhua news agency condemned the move, saying it meant “a nightmare scenario has come a step closer for Japanese people and neighbouring nations.
If passed, the bill will “tarnish the reputation of a nation that has earned international respect for its pacifist Constitution over a period of nearly seven decades,” it said.
Meanwhile, South Korea also reacted to the passage of the bills — although in a muted manner.
A South Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman on Thursday called on Japan to stick to its Constitution.
Japan should conduct discussions on its defense policy while adhering to the spirit of the pacifist Constitution, and in a way to contribute to regional peace and stability and in a transparent
fashion, the spokesman said at a press conference.
The spokesman reiterated Seoul’s stance that actions that could affect security conditions on the Korean Peninsula and the national interests of South Korea should not be taken without consent from
But the spokesman stopped short of directly making a comment criticizing the Lower House approval of the security bills or showing concerns over the development.
South Korea hopes to continue close consultations with Japan while keeping a close watch on upcoming deliberations on the bills at the Upper House.
[aasc-main] NEW RELEASE | Amerasia Journal 42:1 "Carceral States"
Paul Keating welcomes the rise of China
Can Canberra continue strategy of splitting economy, security?
千呼萬喚始出來！ Emerging while kicking and screaming!
China’s new role as a Middle East peacemaker
Weekend Edition: The week's best reads
A New Year’s Letter: Opportunities for 2016
A New Year's Letter: From Vision to Action
miracle’ should inspire US fight on poverty
Watch this video, you will be proud being a Chinese....!
Retro Cold War Guff
www.ChinaUSFriendship.com January 2016 Publication
Chasing Dragons: the True History of the Piasa (Chinese Edition)-“Rainbow Dragon” carved into the bluff by members of Admiral Zheng He’s (郑和)
Kishore Mahbubani. What happens when China becomes number one?
The Army of Terracotta Cave!
My article in the Herald Sun today: We need to make ice use socially unacceptable
www.ChinaUSFriendship.com December 2015 Publication
warning Taiwan voters on independence
raises five-pronged proposal for peace, stability in South China Sea
Face the facts or face World War III
Defeat The Third Jihad: From the Heart of a Muslim
November update on my activities [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Something which touches every citizen in my country
Losing the War with China
Old soldiers never die, they only fade away
Firm reaction for US sea provocation
Opportunities and Challenges for Universities
www.ChinaUSFriendship.com October 2015 Publication
could be Australia’s moment of truth: will we be independent?
China taking its own path toward 'democracy'
China V-Day Parade 2015
What’s Happening in China?
Call To Stop the Immediate Danger of World War III!
Abe, offer a WWII apology alluding to the shame the West should share
Calling the Chinese to have faith and trust in themselves
Abe is leading Japan further away from peace
Message by Foreign Minister Wang Yi At the Launch Ceremony of The Report on China's Implementation of The Millennium Development Goals
Wading through South China Sea sticking points
If Bronwyn Bishop claimed trip as
official business, she must resign
中国虚擬经济权威学着 成思危 2015/07 病死北京，享年八十 驾鹤归西前 ,吟诗自白
South China Sea claims
South China Sea serenity
Does Japan deserve the bombing of Hiroshima?
shanghai today Jun 2015 - Videos showing great contrast of Shanghai city life to life in China
rural Re: The village and the girl - BBC news
Confronting the Past: America Finally Turns Its Attention to Rampant Racism
Pivot Inabsanity: Why US Goading China?
Chinese language - 10 major advantages 漢語的十大優勢,本文是對華語最全面科學的闡述！
China be contained?
China’s the reason why U.S. needs the TPP
Revised China 56 Ethnic Groups - Understanding China
migrants unfairly blamed for Australia’s property shutouts
The oppression of a civilization
Collaborating with China is in America’s national interest
My oped in Australian: The case for constitutional recognition
should stay away from South China Sea
New Book on 'Migrant Remittances in South Asia'
Berlin's tough repentance lesson for Tokyo
The Skirmish in the Spratlys Beating Uncle Sam at His Own Game
New wave of China-bashing irresponsible,harmful to Sino-U.S. ties
Book on 'Asian Migration Policy'
Pauline Hanson Again!
Australia should stay out of the South China Sea
Australia should not follow the US into an ill-considered adventure in the South China Sea
Obama is sowing discontent in S.China Sea
Difficult for US to be objective in South China Sea: Duowei
U.S. meddling in South China Sea unjustified, unprofitable
Stop Calling China a Currency Manipulator
U.S. Rebukes China on Efforts to Build Artificial Islands
What Australians really think about a rising China
secretary Dennis Richardson's Blamey Oration
New Book on International Migration and Development in South Asia
History backs China's firm stand on
Correctly understanding Japan’s postwar history
Beijing’s Formidable Strategy in the South China Sea
More than 450 scholars urge Japan to address history issues
2014-11-27 09:40:09 来源：澳洲《联合时报》
US and Australia dangerously deluded about future
Japan’s ‘whitewashing’ of World War II history rankles some
Divided loyalties: US bomber comments send unfriendly vibes to China
Proof the U.S. is rotten to the core
Abolishing the world’s worst weapons
US should reflect on its own human right record
‘Father of Singapore’ Lee Kuan Yew
China and Australia Will Grow Closer
Understand the real China from the speech of China President, Mr. Xi Jinping.
Drug mules, death penalty and justice
How China is upsetting the old global economic order
Should Asian Americans be Ac2ve in US poli2cs?
Awakening China's 21st century dragon
From National Institutes of Health to the University of Macau: The Transition of a Top Scientist Chuxia Deng (鄧初夏)
Abe's omissions in Jakarta were 'unwise' step backward, historian says
Should Asian Americans be Ac2ve in US poli2cs?
U.S.-China 21: The Future of U.S.-China Relations Under Xi Jinping
Is American MIGHT creating a better world? What is the
Pleasing the emperor
Do YOU Have a GENIUS Level I.Q?! Find Out With a Few of The
Most Fiendish BRAIN-TEASERS Ever!
水秉和 :持有美国密芝根大学的政治学博士学位; 终生为联合国中文秘书处高翻 ,退休后卜居拉斯维斯.
Abe gets negative reviews ahead of U.S. visit
Kevin Rudd: "Are
China & The US Doomed To Conflict?"
Towards a Community of Common Destiny and a New Future for Asia
Martin Jacques: The West should learn from China
U.S. forfeiting its leadership in global finance to China
這有意思 ... 你認識這個’口’字嗎? 那麼你認識多些’口’字嗎?
Beijing lashes out at Washington’s ‘pirate-style sense of insecurity’
Obama's Libya Debacle
BBC News - The
palace of shame that makes China angry
Witnessing China's transformation: American Dr. Nathan Congdon - CCTV News - CCTV.com
The Ripple Effect...BEAUTIFUL! YOU'LL LOVE THIS!
Kevin Rudd on How the US and China Are Correcting Their Trust Deficit
Britain's election fix | Generational change in Timor-Leste | Death in Buenos Aires
A Memorable Evening with a Giant
Japan’s public diplomacy is expensive and errant
With focus on wartime past, Japan's global PR message could misfire
And you wonder why I call Australia home?
Why is the US constantly sowing discord in South ChinaSea?
THE TRUTHS ABOUT IRAQ INVASION
Shaping China's influence
Lima: the not-so-bad news
2014 Nobel Week Highlights
Should China/Hong Kong follow UK’s democracy?
Should the UK monitor Hong Kong’s governance?
Racial Divide: The Tragedy of America's First Black President
听李世默说中国和西方 ERIC LI - A TALE OF TWO POLITICAL SYSTEMS
Discussion on current Hong Kong issue
那 一 年 的 七 月
It's time to share China's side of the story
Is America Ready for China as an 'Equal Brother?'
The Oppression of a Civilization...
McKell Institute Address – Inclusive Growth
Australia has ringside seat as Obama,
Xi stake claims on Asia Pacific
Australia and the China-US Relationships
My article on the Hong Kong protest
A role for Chinese Australians in promoting Australia-China relations.
China banking on infrastructure
Whitlam in China
Reflection of Times Higher Education 2014 World Universities Ranking
An appeal by President of Medical Association for Prevention of War
Why the campaign against Islamic State is doomed
The HKG Storm
No US Democracy for China
Hong Kong's "Occupy Central" Fooling No One
Washington Is Destroying The World - Paul Craig Roberts
Can Civilization Survive "Really Existing Capitalism"? An
Interview With Noam Chomsky
China is Hong Kong’s future – not its enemy
Now is the time to act on climate change
CASS Column: Article For 20 September 2014
Visit by Foreign Minister of PCR
Chinese in WWI
Raising a family of true Malaysians By – Prof Dr. Mohamad Tajuddin Mohamad Rasdi
India vs. China 西方民主令印度永远落后中国 2014-09-01。 宋鲁郑
Time For Honesty And Change In Obama's Failed China Policy
毋忘國恥 – 盧溝橋之七七事變
A good article... China's unprecedented quest for a peaceful rise
Mr. Lee Kuan Yew- It's Stupid to be afraid
Bamboo ceiling' blocking Asian Australians, says commissioner
Access Asialink July 2014 - Don't take China for granted says Ambassador, insights on agribusiness and events in your city
China UK new world order
This edition of the Huaren magazine is by far the best of any production I have seen globally.
Obviously, the standard of the magazine, as judged by the caliber of the authors and the content, is sophisticated and intellectual, has jumped leaps and bounds.
Please accept my personal congratulations to a publication, now in the leading edge of the Chinese Diaspora. Keep the standard up and keep it coming.
Congratulations, once again and well done.
Dr Anthony Pun,
Cbinese Community Council of Australia.l
Grievance Debate - Chinese Acknowledgement
Chris Hayes MP – Adjournment – Multiculturalism 25 June 2013
Abe's Article 9 blitz alarms Asia
And a companion paper is at:
E-Magazine September 2013
E-Magazine January - May 2013
E-Magazine September 2012
E-Magazine May 2012
E-Magazine January 2012
Chinese Ethical Beliefs
One World, One Dream
China’s 56 Ethnic Groups - Understanding China
A civilization state
New Paradigm of 21st Century Higher Education in East Asia : Governance, Accountability , Autonomy and Globalization
Speech about Governance, Accountability and Autonomy in Higher Education at Macau University International Forum
The U. S .Founders and China
Previous Huaren E-Magazine
E-Magazine September 2011
E-Magazine May 2011
E-Magazine January 2011
E-Magazine, May, 2010
E-Magazine - January, 2010
E-Magazine - September, 2009
E-Magazine - May, 2009
E-Magazine - Jan, 2009
E-Magazine - Sep 2008
E-Magazine - May 2008
E-Magazine - January 2008
E-Magazine - Sep 2007