Welcome to Huaren

Huaren

Member Login
User Name:
Password:
Register
487 Mitcham Road
Mitcham 3132
VIC AU
Tel 61-3-98735050
Fax 61-3-98743618

E-Magazine

kschua portrait 2006.jpg

President’s Message 會長的話

Season's Greetings

President's message

Another year is coming to an end. It has been a very challenging year worldwide for our global citizens, politicians and rulers.

Many global citizens still living in amazing poverty and other in severe disadvantaged social circumstances. Wars in Middle East , Africa , Ukraine etc, are still burning wildly, creating millions of refugees and social disasters for many families. Ebola epidemic and other diseases are still haunting the people in Africa and around the world.

However I am hopeful with globalisation, internet exchanges of information and a more effective United Nations, we can all made acutely aware of our shortcomings and various serious mistakes made by our rulers and politicians. We hope better solutions will come by to solve many of our humanity problems if we all work together with love for humanity.

United Nations and various major political powers must work together in a better check and balance system, to tackle these immediate humanity problems we are still facing.

History shows us that ideological and religious conflicts can never be resolved by wars and violent confrontations.

It has to be resolved with conviction through better dialogue, communication, mutual respect and understanding, economy assistance and education measures, and diplomatic solution. We are all human and we all have families and friends to take care of. The world is but one nation and its citizens one people.There is nothing that we cannot resolve through better dialogue, communication, mutual respect and understanding, economic assistance and education measures and bit of fraternity love for everyone involved. I hope all the leaders like presidents Xi, Obama, Putin, Modi, Merkel, Hollande, Widodo, Ma Yingjeau, Park and Kim etc, and Prime Ministers like Cameron, Abe, Abbott, Netanyahu. Najib and Lee etc, can all learn from our human historical lessons and make the world a better place for all global citizens by their action and policies in the coming years.

It is therefore heartening to see the restoration of diplomatic relationship between USA and Cuba. Congratulations to Presidents Barack Obama and Raul Castro. The ideological conflict confines these neighbours to enemy for so many years as have had happened between USA, USSR, CHINA and many other countries in the past. Historical evidence has shown that wars, confrontation, isolation and embargo, may only be bargaining tools for negotiation but not a long term solution. If prolonged, these measures will only make thing worse as people suffer.

There is urgent need to conduct proper and effective dialogue, negotiation and communication between policy makers of the world in particular the leading powers of United Nations. To resolve conflicts, one has to be flexible, give and take with some compromises and face saving measures. A war can be started easily by some crazy personal remark and dislike and uncontrolled power which has no proper check and balance.

In this supposed to be a civilised 21st Century, it is a shame for all of us as human beings and global citizens, to see so much man-made disasters, still being created by ourselves. This is my challenge to all our rulers, politicians and all walks of community leaders, to think of some practical solutions, to make this world a better place for our friends and families, our children and children's children.

May I take this opportunity to wish everyone:

A very Merry Christmas and a safe, healthy, peaceful, joyful 2015.

Dr Ka Sing Chua
President
www.huaren.org

21 DECEMBER 2014






From the Editor

The dispute of Senkaku or Diaoyui islands' ownership between China and Japan is concerning many people in Asia and around the world. On one hand Japan claims that she has the sovereignty over them because they have been under her legal administration since the end of World war 2. While China claims that they belongs to China from the historical perspective. Japan under the Peace Treaty at the end of World War 2, supposed to return the ownership of these islands back to China. But for some unforeseen circumstances, with the eruption of China civil war, China failed to claim them back formally from Japan.

Who actually owns this island is the burning issue.

We hope that it will be resolved one way or the other through peaceful negotiation. Failing that, we suggest that the case be decided in the International Court and tribunal. It is better that way than trying to fight it out militarily. It is not worth having the war to determine the ownership of these islands. As the destruction will be far worse than the benefit for either side. Moreover if a war is declared , its implication will be unmeasurable in term of its influence with the development of China and Japan. Its disastrous effect will not only affect China and Japan but will extend to all Asia countries and the world like Europe and US etc. No one is an island anymore. The war will bring enormous economic disaster, humanity hardship and suffering for many many people, not confined to the Chinese and Japanese.

Cover design for this issue was done by our webmaster James Yin. Thank you James.

Let us hope that the leadership of China and Japan are wiser than that.

Note:
we are looking for a bilangual Editor and Assistant Editor to assist us in compiling our regular Emagazine etc. It is voluntary contribution without monetary remuneration. If you are interested, please contact Dr Ka Sing Chua at contact@huaren.org or kchua@huaren.org

I would like to take this opportunity to again thank my special assistant Dr Yit Seng Yow for patiently help to compile our Emagazine and many other voluntary contributors. Without them, we would not have our regular Emagazine for you to enjoy.


Why I support 80-20 and why you should, too!
By Alice S. Huang

"After living in this country for more than 90% of my life, I am still asked questions like, where are you from? and receive comments on how good my English is! Caucasian minority immigrants in the U.S., once they lose their accents, can pass as White Americans; but we Asian American immigrants will not be able to easily blend into this country's majority population. Despite our educational attainments and earnings, both of which are higher than the average American's, we stand out and can easily become targets of racial harassment or discrimination. To avoid this we need to whole-heartedly participate and contribute in every aspect of American society to the extent that we become indispensable and gain enough influence and power in the economic, military, and political realms to protect ourselves.

This is because racial bias, and worse prejudice, is alive and well in the United States. On top of that the populace is prone to hysteria and fear of those who appear to be different. U.S. history is full of examples of racial laws passed by Congress to prevent Blacks, Chinese, or Mexicans from exercising their full civil rights. The internment of Japanese during the Second World War and their loss of homes and property stand out as examples of what can happen due to mass hysteria. Despite the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1968 and declaration of the unconstitutionality of the Anti-Miscegenation laws in 1967, these rights are not always fully enforced. More recently, after 9/11, besides the continued debates in the U.S. about limiting immigration, there were even questions concerning the rights of naturalized citizens and whether they could be jailed or deported without trial.

As Asian Americans most of us are still focused on our individual families and remain comfortable in the protective social niches that are isolated from mainstream America. Look around us. We cannot ignore that: (1) our children, who volunteered to join the armed forces to fight for the U.S., are often harassed to the extent that they have resorted to suicide as the only way to escape their tormentors; (2) our children's racial profile rather than their capabilities determines their entrance into the college of their choice; (3) we are too slowly entering the power structure of professions compared with those of us who fully qualify due to our training and capabilities; and (4) increasingly there is open resentment of recent wealthy Chinese immigrants who purchase desirable real estate or have the poor taste to build "McMansions".

Although we all hope that our and our progeny's contributions will be gradually recognized and rewarded, we cannot totally ignore the possibility of a sudden reversal of fortune for Asian Americans. Such a reversal could easily happen if the relationship between the governments of the United States and any one of the Asian countries increase in animosity or distrust leading to open warfare. As a group we should accept that self-promotion is an acceptable behavior in successful democracies. That is where 80-20 becomes so important. Unlike other Asian American associations and societies, it is not focused on just educational and cultural exchange. It promotes Asian Americans through political action as its primary goal and secondarily to prevent the stereotyping and denigration of Asian Americans through tasteless venues such as entertainment and in a variety of other circumstances.

Why is 80-20 trying so hard to raise financial support? Only with a strong and sustained financial base will we be able to attract a professional staff dedicated to educate and involve Asian Americans of all ages in the democratic political process and provide the tools for self-interested activism. We need to forge a strong coalition with other Asian American organizations so that by strength in numbers we can increase our political influence. Staff is needed to engage in wide surveillance of activities that prevent the advancement of Asian Americans, make these activities known, and solicit and coordinate appropriate action to counter these activities. This is the right time for 80-20 to succeed, and if does not, it will be because we are still too provincial to see the opportunity we have to provide future security for ourselves and our children.

For all the above reasons, I have directed my main philanthropic efforts recently to 80-20, hoping that a strong financial base in its educational arm will bring together more like-minded Asian Americans who are fully aware of racial history and the unpredictable nature of human society. Gradually, through political and civic education, my hope is that 80-20 as a political action committee will be able to gain strength and influence to fight for justice and fairness for ALL Asian Americans and at the same time educate a cadre of Asian American leaders who will dedicate themselves to being selfless public servants and exemplars of what we can offer to this country.

Why does 80-20 need to raise money? Beside what have been mentioned above.
it also needs to forge a strong and lasting coalition with other Asian American organizations. Join us and help us to accomplish all this by donating as generously as you can." (The End)



Special Message for this special Occasion

Learn the historical lessons from World War I and II

Dear President of USA, Mr Obama, Prime Minister of Australia, Mr Abbott and other World leaders

Australia can be a peace maker and we can do it well. We must not blindly follow the USA. She is our friend and strong ally but she can also make serious mistake as in Korea and Indochina etc.
This is twenty first century civilised world. No time for war games anymore. Dialogue, dialogue and dialogue is the way to go until we find a peaceful solution. A third world war and nuclear war we all must avoid. History showed us that there were never winners in wars but only losers. We all who have been in wars were all losers so do not think you can be a winner and do not glorify any past wars as there is no such war. Humanity all suffered in wars one way or another.
I trust that you all govern for your people and humanity. I challenge any government to have a proper independent referendum before they go to war and see if they have a mandate at all.
No civilised people will vote for a war.

With my best wishes

Dr Ka Sing Chua
President
World Huaren Federation
www.huaren.org
Dear President Obama,

Would you like to comment, please?

Eddie Tang.


Nuclear war our likely future': Russia & China won't accept US hegemony, Reagan official warns

Published time: May 13, 2015 10:13
Edited time: May 15, 2015 07:08
Get short URL
Reuters / David Gray
Reuters / David Gray
China, Military, Nuclear, Politics, Russia,USA
The White House is determined to block the rise of the key nuclear-armed nations, Russia and China, neither of whom will join the "world’s acceptance of Washington’s hegemony," says head of the Institute for Political Economy, Paul Craig Roberts.
The former US assistant secretary of the Treasury for economic policy, Dr Paul Craig Roberts, has written on his blog that Beijing is currently "confronted with the Pivot to Asia and the construction of new US naval and air bases to ensure Washington’s control of the South China Sea, now defined as an area of American National Interests."
Roberts writes that Washington’s commitment to contain Russia is the reason “for the crisis that Washington has created in Ukraine and for its use as anti-Russian propaganda.”
Read morehttp://cdn.rt.com/files/news/3f/01/d0/00/military-patrols-china-islands.n.jpgUS mulls sending military ships, aircraft near South China Sea disputed islands – report

The author of several books, "How America Was Lost" among the latest titles, says that US"aggression and blatant propaganda have convinced Russia and China that Washington intends war, and this realization has drawn the two countries into a strategic alliance."
Dr Roberts believes that neither Russia, nor China will meanwhile accept the so-called"vassalage status accepted by the UK, Germany, France and the rest of Europe, Canada, Japan and Australia." According to the political analyst, the "price of world peace is the world’s acceptance of Washington’s hegemony."
"On the foreign policy front, the hubris and arrogance of America’s self-image as the 'exceptional, indispensable' country with hegemonic rights over other countries means that the world is primed for war," Roberts writes.
He gives a gloomy political forecast in his column saying that "unless the dollar and with it US power collapses or Europe finds the courage to break with Washington and to pursue an independent foreign policy, saying good-bye to NATO, nuclear war is our likely future."
Russia’s far-reaching May 9 Victory Day celebration was meanwhile a "historical turning point,"according to Roberts who says that while Western politicians chose to boycott the 70th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany, "the Chinese were there in their place," China's president sitting next to President Putin during the military parade on Red Square in Moscow.
A recent poll targeting over 3,000 people in France, Germany and the UK has recently revealed that as little as 13 percent of Europeans think the Soviet Army played the leading role in liberating Europe from Nazism during WW2. The majority of respondents – 43 percent – said the US Army played the main role in liberating Europe.
"Russian casualties compared to the combined casualties of the US, UK, and France make it completely clear that it was Russia that defeated Hitler," Roberts points out, adding that "in the Orwellian West, the latest rewriting of history leaves out of the story the Red Army’s destruction of the Wehrmacht."
Read morehttp://img.rt.com/files/news/3d/f3/90/00/war.n.jpgPerverted history: Europeans think US army liberated continent during WW2
The head of the presidential administration, Sergey Ivanov, told RT earlier this month that attempts to diminish the role played by Russia in defeating Nazi Germany through rewriting history by some Western countries are part of the ongoing campaign to isolate and alienate Russia.
Dr Roberts has also stated in his column that while the US president only mentioned US forces in his remarks on the 70th anniversary of the victory, President Putin in contrast"expressed gratitude to 'the peoples of Great Britain, France and the United States of America for their contribution to the victory.'"
The political analyst notes that America along with its allies "do not hear when Russia says 'don’t push us this hard, we are not your enemy. We want to be your partners.'"
While Moscow and Beijing have "finally realized that their choice is vassalage or war," Washington"made the mistake that could be fateful for humanity," according to Dr Roberts.


Memo to Obama: Learn lessons of Korean War to avoid showdown with China

Get short URL
Published time: June 01, 2015 15:11
A P-8A Poseidon surveillance plane (Reuters / U.S. Navy / Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Daniel J. Meshel / Handout)
A P-8A Poseidon surveillance plane (Reuters / U.S. Navy / Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Daniel J. Meshel / Handout)
5334
Tags
China, History, Military, Navy, North Korea, Nuclear, Obama, Politics, Russia,USA, War
The Obama administration would do well to apply lessons from the Korean War 55 years ago if it wants to avert a new war with China, which is growing increasingly wary of the US military’s presence in the region.
Tensions between the US and China have been severely exacerbated in recent days by repeated flights by US military aircraft near the Chinese-controlled artificial islets being built with land from the sea bottom in the South China Sea’s Spratly Islands.
The US military - under the pretext of defending 'freedom of navigation' in the sea - plans to conduct flyovers above the territorial 12-mile limits around the islets. This is reckless almost beyond words and may easily escalate into a military conflict between the two nuclear-armed powers. The Chinese government has lodged an official protest against flights near the islands, and the Chinese government newspaper, the Global Times, stated in an editorial: “If the United States’ bottom line is that China has to halt its activities, then a US-China war is inevitable in the South China Sea.”
Read morehttp://cdn.rt.com/files/news/40/65/d0/00/spratly-islands.n.jpgBeijing rejects US criticism over construction in South China Sea
The official US explanation for military activity around the islets, which is 'freedom of navigation,’ simply lacks credibility. These tiny pieces of real estate, and their 12-mile limits, can in no way impede the free movement of ships in the South China Sea. Claims have also been made, without any substantive evidence, that China may use the islets for extensive military purposes. Whether correct or not, the claim that this would justify military intrusions into Chinese-built islets seems strange coming from the Obama administration and military, which have recently established a whole slew of new military agreements, military bases, and deployed new military equipment all around China in its' Asian neighbor countries.
The real explanation for the US military intrusions around the islets is quite different. It is part of a long-term campaign to encircle and isolate China for the purpose of intimidating, weakening, and possibly even destabilizing China to the point where the independent government is replaced by a client state of the US. This campaign is officially referred to as the US 'Pivot to Asia' and is made up of military, economic, and informational elements aimed at isolating and weakening China.
The military element of the encirclement campaign is officially called the 'Air-Sea Battle-Plan', which involves the transfer of up to 60 percent of US military forces - equipped with the latest military equipment - into the Asian theater. The plan also involves creating new US military agreements and new US military bases for American forces in countries around China, including Australia, the Philippines, South Korea and Japan.
Read morehttp://cdn.rt.com/files/news/3f/f6/50/00/china-military-defense-lighthouses1.n.jpgDefense to offense: China unveils new military strategy to boost naval capability
The economic element of the encirclement campaign is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP.) The TPP is a US-proposed treaty - currently the subject of negotiations between Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam - intended to impose regulatory and investment conditions in Asia. More importantly, it would exclude China from the new economic zone.
The informational element of the encirclement campaign consists of accusations by US political figures, which are endlessly repeated in the US mass media, claiming there is a 'China threat.' This assertion stands reality on its head. After all, the US has approximately 650 military bases around the world and is waging continual wars; China has no military bases in foreign countries and has waged no wars in the last 30 years.
http://rt.com/files/opinionpost/40/6e/50/00/spratly-islands-map.jpg
These military, economic, and informational attempts to encircle China reflect US foreign policy concepts are known as 'the Brezinski Doctrine' and "the Wolfowitz Doctrine,' which basically state that for the US government to remain the dominant power on Earth it must secure total dominance of the Eurasian continent, upon which the independent nations of Russia and China occupy central positions.
Following these doctrines, while continuing to attempt to encircle China, and ignoring China's current warnings regarding US military activity around or over its' islets, is dangerous to say the least. It seems we’ve been here before. Sixty-five years ago, during the Korean War, China similarly warned that US-led military forces must not occupy its neighbor, North Korea, nor bring its military forces near the North Korea-Chinese border. Despite some alternate views, the consensus among most US policy makers at that time was that China's' warnings were a mere bluff, and that it would not intervene in the Korean War as the US-led forces moved to occupy North Korea. In fact, China's warnings were an attempt to avoid a military confrontation with the US military.
When the warnings were ignored, and US-led forces occupied most of North Korea and approached the Chinese border, Chinese military forces massively intervened, driving the US-led forces completely out of North Korea and back into South Korea, where they remain to this day. The result of the US miscalculation was the deaths of large numbers of Chinese, US, and Korean soldiers and civilians as the American forces were driven out of North Korea.
Like its warnings during the Korean War, China's warnings that some sort of conflict may result from US military intrusions on or near its islet territory should be taken very seriously. Imagine that the US government was building small artificial islets in the ocean off the coast of California, and that China began moving military aircraft and military vessels into the areas around these islets, while insisting that the US had no right to build these islets.
In that scenario, as well as in the current one, there would be a real danger that by miscalculation, accident, or intention by one side or the other a military conflict leading to war with devastating consequences might be triggered.
Hopefully, US policy makers will take China’s warnings seriously, draw back from the encirclement campaign against the country and learn from the disastrous lesson of the Korean War. In that way, we could avoid repeating history while sparing the world yet another terrible war.
Eric Sommer for RT
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.


楊瀾:我愛你,謝謝你

我所認識的劉烱朗院士:「小時了了,大了成師」的澳門人

网络言论的自由与边界

Does Japan deserve the bombing of Hiroshima?

shanghai today Jun 2015 - Videos showing great contrast of Shanghai city life to life in China rural Re: The village and the girl - BBC news

Confronting the Past: America Finally Turns Its Attention to Rampant Racism

Pivot Inabsanity: Why US Goading China?

汕頭大學第九屆2015校董會常年會議的一些思考

China Syndrome

中共反腐遭遇“软抵抗”背后

Chinese language - 10 major advantages 漢語的十大優勢,本文是對華語最全面科學的闡述!

Can China be contained?

China’s the reason why U.S. needs the TPP

「珠江三角洲」科學技術變革時代來臨的一些思考

Revised China 56 Ethnic Groups - Understanding China

何为中国的“软实力”?

Chinese migrants unfairly blamed for Australia’s property shutouts

The oppression of a civilization

Collaborating with China is in America’s national interest

送秋一首诗——澳洲秋天最后一日的早晨

My oped in Australian: The case for constitutional recognition

Australia should stay away from South China Sea

New Book on 'Migrant Remittances in South Asia'

Berlin's tough repentance lesson for Tokyo

The Skirmish in the Spratlys Beating Uncle Sam at His Own Game

Commentary: New wave of China-bashing irresponsible,harmful to Sino-U.S. ties

真失望,艾伯待还在盲目追随美国

“中等收入陷阱”并不存在

中国驻澳大使马朝旭撰文:维护南海的和平与稳定

最绝望的堕落—写给中国知识分子

如何解决难民潮这个国际大问题?

Book on 'Asian Migration Policy'

Pauline Hanson Again!

Australia should stay out of the South China Sea

突然觉得祖国真不容易

Australia should not follow the US into an ill-considered adventure in the South China Sea

Obama is sowing discontent in S.China Sea

Difficult for US to be objective in South China Sea: Duowei

China update

U.S. meddling in South China Sea unjustified, unprofitable

Stop Calling China a Currency Manipulator

中美并未进入南海军事冲突倒计时

U.S. Rebukes China on Efforts to Build Artificial Islands

What Australians really think about a rising China

Defence secretary Dennis Richardson's Blamey Oration

New Book on International Migration and Development in South Asia

History backs China's firm stand on islands

Correctly understanding Japan’s postwar history

Beijing’s Formidable Strategy in the South China Sea

让讲真话不再费力

中国人。。你要自信!

中泰開鑿克拉運河打通亞洲財路

More than 450 scholars urge Japan to address history issues

「莫言有言」:與大師共進晚餐

全澳华人侨领高峰论坛在黄金海岸圆满举行
2014-11-27 09:40:09 来源:澳洲《联合时报

谈谈澳洲联邦预算案

解密以色列如何成强国

US and Australia dangerously deluded about future

Japan’s ‘whitewashing’ of World War II history rankles some U.S. veterans

Divided loyalties: US bomber comments send unfriendly vibes to China

Proof the U.S. is rotten to the core

中美两国应学会“友善与共享”

Abolishing the world’s worst weapons

US should reflect on its own human right record

澳門與澳門大學新時代的縮影:澳門年輕學子與澳門大學知名教授的論壇

这二胡拉的,把老外全镇住了!看看什么叫掌声根本停不下来。

‘Father of Singapore’ Lee Kuan Yew

西方缺席的俄罗斯二战结束纪念日

美国对华的文化战略

台大校长:好成绩不是好人才

China and Australia Will Grow Closer

历史的纠结

乔良:中美博弈

中国社会需要一致的是非观

领袖是人不是神——从毕福剑事件聊起

从澳纽军团纪念日想到世界和平

美国种族问题依然难解

Understand the real China from the speech of China President, Mr. Xi Jinping.

Drug mules, death penalty and justice

<<亮丽人生>>

李克强:中国无意挑战国际秩序

How China is upsetting the old global economic order

Should Asian Americans be Ac2ve in US poli2cs?

Awakening China's 21st century dragon

From National Institutes of Health to the University of Macau: The Transition of a Top Scientist Chuxia Deng (鄧初夏)

傅莹:与FT共进午餐

Abe's omissions in Jakarta were 'unwise' step backward, historian says

Should Asian Americans be Ac2ve in US poli2cs?

拥抱观念新世界

中美减排声明展示领导力

中美应避免两败俱伤

U.S.-China 21: The Future of U.S.-China Relations Under Xi Jinping

莫言在东亚文学论坛上的演讲:哪些人是有罪的

警惕Reclaim Australia的游行示威

切勿用TPP制衡中国

Is American MIGHT creating a better world? What is the evidence?

澳門學子一談

Pleasing the emperor

Do YOU Have a GENIUS Level I.Q?! Find Out With a Few of The Most Fiendish BRAIN-TEASERS Ever!

村山敦促安倍70周年谈话继承“反省”

水秉和 :持有美国密芝根大学的政治学博士学位; 终生为联合国中文秘书处高翻 ,退休后卜居拉斯维斯.

Abe gets negative reviews ahead of U.S. visit

Kevin Rudd: "Are China & The US Doomed To Conflict?"

Towards a Community of Common Destiny and a New Future for Asia

聯合報民意論壇

亚投行搞乱世界格局

马云德国演讲

向前总理弗雷泽先生致敬

一带一路清楚解释

李光耀

Martin Jacques: The West should learn from China

U.S. forfeiting its leadership in global finance to China

修正版[三月新貼☆心水子頁]分享: 墨爾本僑功勳錄

這有意思 ... 你認識這個’口’字嗎? 那麼你認識多些’口’字嗎?

Beijing lashes out at Washington’s ‘pirate-style sense of insecurity’

Obama's Libya Debacle

BBC News - The palace of shame that makes China angry

Witnessing China's transformation: American Dr. Nathan Congdon - CCTV News - CCTV.com English

The Ripple Effect...BEAUTIFUL! YOU'LL LOVE THIS!

陆克文:勿恶意揣测中国 澳美应加入亚投行

今日焦点:让“新乡村运动”重塑故乡

Kevin Rudd on How the US and China Are Correcting Their Trust Deficit

Britain's election fix | Generational change in Timor-Leste | Death in Buenos Aires

中国国家主席习近平发表2015年新年贺词

A Memorable Evening with a Giant

Japan’s public diplomacy is expensive and errant

With focus on wartime past, Japan's global PR message could misfire

And you wonder why I call Australia home?

中国过于担心“西方价值观”?

Why is the US constantly sowing discord in South ChinaSea?

中国一定要建立自己的社会学理论

“建太多”、“借太多”困扰中国

中国一路一带

THE TRUTHS ABOUT IRAQ INVASION

李克强:中国经济不会硬着陆

中国要治贪官污吏,还得靠法

Shaping China's influence

莫言在东亚文学论坛上的演讲,越听越精彩,有人说这篇该获诺贝尔奖

今年达沃斯必须关注中产

达沃斯的逻辑

法治社会要开放言论自由

Lima: the not-so-bad news

中国创新不足吗?

2014 Nobel Week Highlights

中日领导人须面对面商磋钓鱼岛争端

盼早日圆海内外华人的“中国梦”!

路在何方

小时候的故乡

领导人你干什么 ?

Should China/Hong Kong follow UK’s democracy?

Should the UK monitor Hong Kong’s governance?

Racial Divide: The Tragedy of America's First Black President

成功大學「雅韻山河」會議前言

听李世默说中国和西方 ERIC LI - A TALE OF TWO POLITICAL SYSTEMS

Discussion on current Hong Kong issue

那 一 年 的 七 月

It's time to share China's side of the story

Is America Ready for China as an 'Equal Brother?'

The Oppression of a Civilization...

第七屆兩岸四地大學學術交流研討會結語

McKell Institute Address – Inclusive Growth

Australia has ringside seat as Obama,
Xi stake claims on Asia Pacific

Australia and the China-US Relationships

赵朴初:宇宙规律

My article on the Hong Kong protest

A role for Chinese Australians in promoting Australia-China relations.

觀點:拒絕一國兩制 台灣不是香港

China banking on infrastructure

Whitlam in China

应重新评估中国式治理制度

反腐需厘清党纪与国法关系

中国依法治国的阻力与目标

Reflection of Times Higher Education 2014 World Universities Ranking

An appeal by President of Medical Association for Prevention of War

Why the campaign against Islamic State is doomed

The HKG Storm

福山的良治社会三要素

No US Democracy for China

Hong Kong's "Occupy Central" Fooling No One

观察香港问题的十个认识误区(上)

Washington Is Destroying The World - Paul Craig Roberts

北京有沒有理由預防香港冒出另一個李登輝?

如何理解新中国的巨大成就?

Can Civilization Survive "Really Existing Capitalism"? An Interview With Noam Chomsky

中国不会复制西方式法治

China is Hong Kong’s future – not its enemy

值得思考的當代人的鸦片

在纪念孔子诞辰2565周年国际学术研讨会暨国际儒学联合会第五届会员大会开幕会上的讲话

中国应带头打破气候谈判僵局

论民主化

Now is the time to act on climate change

墨尔本

CASS Column: Article For 20 September 2014

西方社会财富不平等的症结

Visit by Foreign Minister of PCR

Chinese in WWI

习已交代身后事

Raising a family of true Malaysians By – Prof Dr. Mohamad Tajuddin Mohamad Rasdi

留美学者致习先生的一封信

India vs. China 西方民主令印度永远落后中国 2014-09-01。 宋鲁郑

超越历史的邓小平

对澳议员辱华言论的冷思考

重估邓小平

Time For Honesty And Change In Obama's Failed China Policy

中国学术界不能只引进

一篇新文章《余登泰山〉

毋忘國恥 – 盧溝橋之七七事變

宋朝的艺术

一战爆发100周年的警示

快活−國畫古詩

A good article... China's unprecedented quest for a peaceful rise

根治腐败不能回避制度变革

Mr. Lee Kuan Yew- It's Stupid to be afraid

羅伯特·凱根的新保守主義宣言

Bamboo ceiling' blocking Asian Australians, says commissioner

Access Asialink July 2014 - Don't take China for granted says Ambassador, insights on agribusiness and events in your city

China UK new world order

汕頭大學2014年第九屆第二次校董會發言


钓鱼岛值得一争,但不值得一战

中国与日本由钓鱼岛引发的争端不断升级,大有一发不可收拾之势,有人说双方非打不可。因为双方继续固守各自的“强硬”立场,如有误判或意气用事,擦枪走火就极有可能。

日本与中国有千丝万缕的文化渊源,难道双方真的不能以文明之理来服人,一定要用“野蛮”的“武力”手段一决高下吗?

依笔者之见,退一步海阔天空,中日要重启理性对话的大门。即便真的谈不下去,也应该考虑让国际法庭来裁决。

如果国与国之间有什么争端不能解决,完全可以提交给国际法庭来和平解决。“法治”胜过“武治”,这应该是每一个有远见的领导人都知道的道理。我们已经看到,在法治不健全的国家,企图用武力来统治的政权最终都引火自焚。叙利亚就是崇尚“武治”,把一个好好的国家弄得四分五裂。

一个国家要长治久安,必须以法律来治国而不是以武力来治国,武力只能用来维护真理、惩罚犯罪的人。这是人类历史文明的基石。如果用武力来决定谁对谁错,那么胜者不一定是对的一方,而败者不一定是错的一方。这不但解决不了问题,反而会加深矛盾,搞得两败俱伤,都没有好结果。

中日如果开战,将影响整个亚洲甚至整个世界经济的命脉,世界第二和第三大经济国首当其冲,承受得起吗?

两国如果真的谈不好如何解决钓鱼岛的主权问题,大不了告上国际法庭,各自引经据典辩论公堂,看看最后真理在哪一方,哪一方才是钓鱼岛的真正主人。

我认为,钓鱼岛值得中日在国际公堂联合国主持下力争、理争,但不值得双方为之一战!



Dear Kasing,
This edition of the Huaren magazine is by far the best of any production I have seen globally.
Obviously, the standard of the magazine, as judged by the caliber of the authors and the content, is sophisticated and intellectual, has jumped leaps and bounds.
Please accept my personal congratulations to a publication, now in the leading edge of the Chinese Diaspora. Keep the standard up and keep it coming.
Congratulations, once again and well done.

Dr Anthony Pun,
National President
Cbinese Community Council of Australia.l

Grievance Debate - Chinese Acknowledgement

Chris Hayes MP – Adjournment – Multiculturalism 25 June 2013


Abe's Article 9 blitz alarms Asia

In Chinese:
https://www.academia.edu/6861711/Competing_Claims_to_the_Diaoyu_Senkaku_Islands_under_International_Law_A_Critical_Evaluation_Chinese_

In English:
https://www.academia.edu/6837859/Competing_Claims_to_the_Diaoyu_Senkaku_Islands_under_International_Law_A_Critical_Evaluation

And a companion paper is at:
http://japanfocus.org/site/view/3877


E-Magazine September 2013

E-Magazine January - May 2013

E-Magazine September 2012

E-Magazine May 2012

E-Magazine January 2012


Chinese Ethical Beliefs

One World, One Dream

China’s 56 Ethnic Groups - Understanding China

A civilization state

New Paradigm of 21st Century Higher Education in East Asia : Governance, Accountability , Autonomy and Globalization

Speech about Governance, Accountability and Autonomy in Higher Education at Macau University International Forum

The U. S .Founders and China


Archive-Press-Oct-2008



Previous Huaren E-Magazine

E-Magazine September 2011

E-Magazine May 2011

E-Magazine January 2011

E-Magazine, May, 2010

E-Magazine - January, 2010

E-Magazine - September, 2009

E-Magazine - May, 2009

E-Magazine - Jan, 2009

E-Magazine - Sep 2008

E-Magazine - May 2008

E-Magazine - January 2008

E-Magazine - Sep 2007

E-Magazine - May 2007

E-Magazine January 2007